Literature Review

Showing posts with label An era of Darkness. Show all posts
Showing posts with label An era of Darkness. Show all posts

Assignment : Cultural studies : Pierre Bourdieu and Cultural Intermediaries

                    Assignment

                         Cultural studies

Name :  Ravina Parmar
Roll no : 18
SEM : M.A. sem- 2
Batch year : (2019-2021)
Email :ravinaparmar827@gmail.com
Enrollment no : 2069108420200031
          Submitted to : Smt. S. B. Gardi English Department Bhavnagar, Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University.

   Topic :
Pierre Bourdieu and Cultural Intermediaries

The  term "Cultural Intermediaries" is coined by Pierre Bourdieu. Who was a well known French socialist.  Here we look for how intermediary worked for n Cultural studies. In a way the intermediary means a person who acts as a link between people in order to try and bring about agreement as a mediator. How and which way Culture is affected by popular production and marketing. How the Intermediaries are used Cultural test and Cultural connotations. How they make an effect on a particular culture's mind and to inspire them to sell the products.

       So the basic concept of these projects, particular image of the product at hand, suggest particular values and qualities and sell it to the consumer. There is a link between two groups that is consumption and  production of Culture.

They present the things in an interesting way that the consumer wants the things with them.  And also they occur between this two realms like production and consumer.

Their main function is to represent the Cultural object in such a way that a desire for the same thing in the mind of consumers, then who they buy the object.

             In recent years, research on cultural intermediaries has been engaged to a greater extent with actor network theory, economic sociology and cultural economy. Actor Network Theory is about a theoretical and methodological approach to social theory where everything in the social and natural worlds exists in constantly shifting networks of relationships. It posits that nothing exists outside those relationships. There is a concept of designer and users.

             In Cultural Intermediaries "Economy" is also often at the forefront discussion. If any particular region has a good economic condition then also the style and ideas differ for them, from Intermediaries. An  intermediary is offering ‘expertise’ in the production of cultural products. This mediation during the production stage affects the consumption, or perception of a product, though how this is measured is questionable.

            Bourdieu also talked about economic and cultural capital. In the case of Distinction, the specific focus of the research was on how social stratification is reproduced and legitimated through notions of taste, as they are expressed and enacted through consumption.the importance of , ‘considering the interdependence between the two spheres of production and consumption as conceptualized in the literatures on economization and the economy of qualities.’ 

            Intermediaries are external groups, individuals, or businesses that make it possible for the company to deliver their products to the end user. For example, merchants are intermediaries that buy and resell products. That is there  but which type of questions asked by Cultural studies :

-: What exactly is the relationship of the cultural Intermediaries to the product being sold?
-: Does the Intermediaries really  influence audience reactions ?
-: What is the role played by mediators ?

      Let's have something more about French socialist Petrie Bourdieu.

Pierre Bourdieu : 


Pierre Bourdieu was a renowned sociologist and public intellectual who made significant contributions to general sociological theory, theorizing the link between education and culture, and research into the intersections of taste, class, and education. He is well known for pioneering such terms as "symbolic violence," "cultural capital," and "habitus."

Notable work by him :

The School as a Conservative Force (1966)

Outline of a Theory of Practice (1977)

Reproduction in Education, Society, and Culture (1977)

Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste (1984)

"Forms of Capital" (1986)

Language and Symbolic Power (1991)

       These are the famous works by him in which I wanted to include 'Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste.' In this work we find that. He was discussed about Cultural Intermediaries. Although cultural intermediaries are not discussed in a level of detail commensurate with the scale of Bourdieu’s study.

        In this work  he discussed five interrelated dimensions of his account that pertain to Cultural Intermediaries.


  • New economy, new class relations :-

Bourdieu’s analysis of cultural intermediary occupations is informed by what he 
regarded as a new economy. Cultural intermediary occupations are, for Bourdieu, an effect both of an economy requiring the production of need, and of class anxiety about upward and downward social mobility. It is the latter factor that attracts most of Bourdieu’s attention: this strengthens his understanding of the subjective dynamics at play for the new petite bourgeoisie. However, it is also a limitation, as noted by critics who complain that Bourdieu largely ignores the institutional, political economic context of cultural industries and the division of labour that has developed therein.


  • New occupations :-

           New occupations also play a vital role in Cultural Intermediaries. How Intermediaries affect the newly formed occupations. Both class fractions of new occupations are involved in the creation of wants. The new bourgeois cultural intermediaries are the instigators of new tastes and practices, because their profits and power are reliant on the production of needs.


  • Taste makers :-

Cultural intermediaries are defined by their work as taste makers. This is intertwined with Bourdieu’s understanding of how taste operates as ‘a match-maker’ between people and things . Cultural intermediaries cannot enforce desires or purchases; rather, they create the conditions for consumers to identify their tastes in goods.


  • Expertise and legitimacy :-

                      Cultural intermediaries are not simply taste makers; they are professional taste makers and ‘authorities of legitimation’. Through professionalization strategies, ‘new’ cul-
Tural intermediary occupations will emerge, to compete over what counts as ‘good'.


  • Cultural capital and dispositions :-

            Bourdieu mentioned that the link between cultural intermediary occupations and individual practitioners’ habits, and particularly their stocks of cultural capital and subjective dispositions. So in Cultural Intermediaries we find that the importance of Cultural capital.

✍️ And also He established two relationships. On the one hand, there is a close link between cultural practices 
e.g. what people like to do, and how they do it,
 and educational capital and social origin that is the amount of formal education received, and social class of parents.

           On the other hand, people with similar amounts of education from different social origins may be similar in what they like and do in areas of ‘legitimate’ culture 
e.g. their views of modern art or composers – knowledge that is more readily transmitted via education) but will differ most in areas of everyday life, such as clothing, furniture and food 
choice.

There is also the importance of power as power dominates many things. Even the lifestyle of common people is also dominated by those who are in  power and also the center of the society. The norns and conditions made by them. If they are producing any product then they create circumstances and situations to consume this product that is something valuable and great.

          Julian Matthews and Jennifer Smith Maguire in the introduction to their recent publication The Cultural Intermediaries Reader open with the following statement:

‘Cultural intermediaries are the taste makers defining what counts as good taste and cool culture in today’s marketplace. Working at the intersection of culture and economy, they perform critical operations in the production and promotion of consumption, constructing legitimacy and adding value through the qualification of goods.’

      How Intermediaries check everything about their consumer where they belong , which type of economic condition they have, that all the things through they desides their plan for marketing and advertising for products. 


In which we can say that marketing and advertising  is the best example for the cultural Intermediaries, this is also an important things, "comes into its own in all the occupations involving presentation and representation (sales, marketing, advertising, public relations, fashion, decoration and so forth) and in all the institutions providing symbolic goods and services. "

        If we take examples of the film industry then we understand how the Cultural Intermediaries worked in society. On the production side we have producers, directors, film making companies and the celebrity stars. And also on the consumption side we have large numbers of people. Today we can not come to any film that is unknown to the audience. So today because of social media everyone knows about everything. How this is achieved is part of Cultural studies.

       As we know that marketing and advertising is the best way to reach Cultural context. The production house plays a vital role in intermediaries. The marketing wing of the flim and the distribution agency put promotional materials. They make various advertisements for films, make big hoardings. In various T.V. serials we find that the elements of upcoming films and the hero actors go on the set and introduce their upcoming films. Before the release of the movie they go to every platform that most people like, the music and the songs, steps of the dance goes viral and that through large numbers of audience attract towards the films.

     Now the actor and actress themselves introduce his or her films through their social media accounts. The news channels introduced the films and gave short interviews. The magazine and the newspaper also published an article on films. 

              So they tried to reach every aspect of life that the audience should use. They know the Cultural context of the audience and work upon that. In a way that is the Intermediaries that goes to hand with the Audience.

           So the advertising and the marketing is the key moments the process wrei Cultural products are 'sold'. It is possible that the Cultural Intermediaries have knowledge of the actual process of the Cultural Intermediaries. They don't think about the economic condition of that man, but they just make the materials of production and produced it. That is the expertise with the Cultural Intermediaries. We can even say that the fan club of the particular star that is the good Cultural Intermediaries.  So in a way not only this factor but also that political parties also play a role in between.


Conclusion :

              In closing, we note that while the ‘cultural turn’ has generated significant and nuanced accounts of the agency of consumers, and compelling analyses of the macro-structures of consumer culture, in our scholarship and popular imaginaries the market remains removed by and large from our considerations of culture.

        Now we can find digital Cultural Intermediaries in which we take examples of celebrities who make videos on what products they use for their everyday life's makeup. They gave us names of products and recommended us to use these products. In a way that is the Intermediaries in digital platform. Like YouTube, Facebook, tweeter and Instagram.

Work Cited :

Bourdieu, P. Distinction, a Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge. (1984) [1979].


Crossman, Ashley. "A Brief Biography of Pierre Bourdieu." ThoughtCo, Feb. 11, 2020, thoughtco.com/pierre-bourdieu-3026496.


Du Gay, P. & Nixon, S. Who Needs Cultural Intermediaries? Cultural Studies. Vol 16, No 4, pp. 495-500.


Matthews, J. & Smith, J. (eds) . The Cultural Intermediaries Reader. London: Sage.(2014).


Nayar, Pramod K. An Introduction of Cultural studies. Viva Books Private Limited, April 20,2011.

Thank you……….

Thinking activity : Technoculture, Speed and Slow movement


Hello readers !

Welcome to my world ! We live in the 21st century in which we find that too much acceleration and speed. Each and every moment the speed is important in this age. This is my academic blog. In which I am discussing Baudrillard and his view on  Hyperreal, Simulation and simulacra) and Paul's Virilio ( Dromology)  Ulrich Beck ( Risk society ) then about Slow movement, how that is connected with the idea. Now the Culture also changed  with speed. But in Culture we need the slow movement. How the slow philosophy is helping us in are Culture.


" Learning the basics of being a digital citizen is a critical skill for all children in the 21st century. " 

– Hadi Partovi, CEO at Code.org

  I think that is related to the slow movement in which everything is going on fast. So humans think that we have to know all the things that are new and which new features are produced in technology. That curiosity is needed but in a way that is harmful for us.

Jean Baudrillard  was a French socialist and who coined the term ' Hyperrealism' .  He defined 

"A real without origin or reality"

                     Paul Virilio - (Dromology)  , he is one of the most important theorists of speed and technology. He had discussed the significance of speed and technology in the postmodern era. He also mentioned that the speed of transmission  shared not only the individual perspective but also the social, cultural aspects. That speed through we can say that the real became more fake.
                Ulrich Beak - ( Risk society )



who has written extensively about risk and globalization. He argues that the risk is not only about technology , and all the things , is n which we can include all the traditions that were abolished, the traditional custom changed, erosion of traditional family patterns and democratization of personal relations.

                 In a modern society, there is technological change. Industrial society has created many new dangers of risks unknown in previous ages. The risks associated with global warming are one example. In the present era of industrialization. In nature obviously the risk is there. But we can say that new modernity creates dangerous risks for society. There is a chain of problems and solutions.  How hurriedly the atomic power and weapons industry increases, in a way that is the risk. So for that risk another country tried to make more powerful weapons. In that way the chain of problems and solutions going on. We are in a trap if social evils.

Organizations are not only part of the solution but also very much part of the problem: “We have more to fear from organizations and experts overextending their reach, propelled by forces endemic
to modern society, than from conniving conspiracies,” argues Clarke
(1999, p. 2).

If we think about how Culture and the postmodernist are looking at Slow movement. Slow movement is about knowing the speed of the world and to desides what speed one should maintain.

“Is it possible in today’s superfast world to live slow? Would I be able to keep my job? Provide a good living for my family? Does being ‘slow’ mean low efficiency, low effectiveness?”

– G. Berthelsen

That is the question of how we can define what is low efficiency. The Slow Movement’s roots are traced back to the original slow movement, Slow Food.






Shashi tharoor

Hello readers !

Welcome to my blog. This is about famous author Shashi Tharoor. 




He was the Indian politician, writer and a former international diplomat. And also he is an acclaimed writer having authored 18 bestselling works of fiction and non- fiction. Who is currently serving as member of parliament, Lok Sabha  from Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala since 2009. In this year he won the very famous Sahitya Akademi award for 2019. This award goes to his famous creatively non-fiction work " An Era of Darkness ".


In this blog we listen to the interview of Shashi tharoor and then write down our likes and  dislikes. (Click here to watch interviews )



This work is published in 2017.  This is written in a post colonial context. How the British empire is ruled on Indian people. And also the thing is how they make a disastrous effect on in Indian Economy. In his interview we find that many arguments that I like the most. 

  • Indian Economy :

Through the interview we got the information about the economic percentage of India.  In the time period 1600 when Britishers came to India and at that time India's GDP was twenty three percent. When they left India and  at that time GDP was only three percent. That showed us how they lumbered the indian. Another thing is that Britisher increase their percentage. As we know that ancient India is known as "sone ki Chirya" the golden sparrow. They bring everything from India and increase their wealth.


English language :


How English language came in india. Through the Britishers, right. Britishers who speak in English language and that is the gifted language by them. Shashi Tharoor argued that the credit of this english language does not go to the Britishers but the Indians. Because they took a English as a language for their work.


Development of Railway in India :


Another argument is that Indian railway's credit goes to the Britishers and in which we don't find any colonial aspects. But Shashi Tharoor said that the Indian Railways are the big colonial stamp.  Railway's is not helpful to Indian people as much as Britishers because through the railway they increase their wealth and easily find the raw materials and easy transportation. And also transportation of labours. So that through Shashi Tharoor made his point clear that the Railways are the big colonial stamp.


How different is British Colonial rules from others :

In world history we can find out the different countries like France, Belgium, England's colonial rules are different. In India we got freedom through Gandhi's अहींसा. If we make Ahinsa agitate in front of churchill. Then there is no worth. Shashi Tharoor said that the Colonial rules are different.


 👉 Reviews of the book :



I have read the reviews of the book ' An era of darkness'. In this review we understand the situations and how Britishers ruled upon us. How cruelly they ruled upon us.



(As Tharoor points out, prior to colonialism India was one of the foremost world economies, a country of great craftsmen and culture, the birth-place of many great religions and philosophical theories, a land which, like all others had experienced is fair share of intolerance and oppression, but still a place where a multitude of communities had co-existed in relative peace and harmony. It is therefore one of the greatest-and most insidious-myths peddled by the British that India was a bucolic backwater, whose citizens were stuck in a stupor of stupidity and ignoble idiocy, waiting to be roused by the great British liberators. In reality  greed, avarice, racism and the cold calculating laws of the market and realpolitik were the motivating factors behind colonialism, to drain Indian of it’s resource , both intellectual and economical; the idea that colonialism was driven by some sort of altruistic motive, or by the ideas of the enlightenment is ridiculous.) -Inderjit Sanghera


Also many people said that the British abolished the evil of indian society. But Shashi Tharoor points out that that is not true. The abolition of the cruel rules in India that is not because of the Britishers but the Indians like Raja Ram mohan Roy and others. Who fight against the evils of Indian society.


Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o :


             Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o is a Kenyan writer and academic who writes primarily in Gikuyu. His work includes novels, plays, short stories, and essays, ranging from literary and social criticism to children's literature.


Summarise Ngugi Wa Thiong'o's views on Introduction : Towards the Universal Language of Struggles from - Decolonising the mind : The Politics of language in African Literature :


        This is a collection of essays about language and its constructive role in national culture, history, and identity.


Decolonising the Mind is split into four essays:

"The Language of African Literature," 


"The Language of African Theatre,"


 "The Language of African Fiction,"


 and "The Quest for Relevance."


Ngũgĩ describes the book as 


"a summary of some of the issues in which I have been passionately involved for the last twenty years of my practice in fiction, theatre, criticism, and in teaching of literature".




References :


Thiong'o, Ngũgĩ wa (1986). Decolonising the Mind. ISBN 0-435-08016-4.




Thank you.......


Also many people said that Britisher who abolished evil of the indian society. But Shashi Tharoor point out that, that is not true. The abolition of the cruel rules in India that is not because of the Britishers but the Indians like Raja Ram mohan Roy and others. Who fight against the evils of Indian society.


Thank you.......