Workshop on quality and Authenticity of wed resources

Hello friends !

Welcome to my blog. Here I am writing about my experience and my viewpoint on workshop.  On the day 19th November 2019 one workshop was organized by Dr. Dilip barad sir at Department of English, Bhavangar, Gujarat, India. The workshop is about

  SEER : Source Educational Evaluation Rubric.

In this workshop sir gave information about What is the essential thing to find out qualified web resources for our research. In this digital era each and every person deal with Internet for their research.

What is the need to do all the things ? Is that to Know about right information. If any person doing research and who is relying on particular source then that is harmful for research. And also for those websites have good quality they remaining.

Second part is about The plagiarism spectrum. Plagiarism is the good for research. Many students doing cut, copy and paste in his research work that is the bad use of technology. But here we have a solution for this kind of problem.

The Turnitin site gives us a rubric in which we find that these five things:

• Authority :  Is the site well regarded, cited, and written by experts in the field.

• Educational value: Does the site content help Advance educational goals?

• Intent: Is the site a well regarded source of of content and viewpoints?

• Originality: Is the site source of original content and viewpoints?

• Quality: Is the site highly vetted with good coverage of the topical area?

Here I am taking three site and gone through this rubric.

	Cliffnotes	SparkNotes	Wikipedia
Authoritative	2     Site is regarded reputable information  that is also cited.	3      This site is the well regarded and content written by scholars.	2    In this site we not find that particular author.
Educational value	3    In this site we find that valuable content with points.	3      well discussed with various topics	4      This site's educational value is high and content that exceeds instructions goals.
Intent	3   To inform learner with well regarded information and some of the facts.	3     Site gives information with particular part wise.	3     This site is not highly well regarded his job is to inform.
Originality	2    Site regarded original sources but combining with repurposed content.	3    Site offers original and well regarded Content.	2   Every person add his view on this site, so that is not reliable.
Quality	3     This site is good quality and good content.	3     Quality is there and one more thing  is there that is information come with topics and points.	4     Content is the high quality and also established good coverage.

In this table green number is represent the points that I have given the particular site. That is the rubric evolution of the web resources by Turnitin company. That is the three example of site.

This is the way to find out an authentic and qualified web resources for our assignment and research. In this digital era we don't rely on one source. But we have to gone through each and every source and then decided that which is appropriate one.

So , overall this workshop is fruitful for us. All students got aware about the authenticity and quality of the web resources. We all thankful our head of the department, Dilip barad sir for arranging this type of workshop.

Thank you......