Literature Review

Bilingualism, Trilingualism and Multilingualism.

 Hello friends ๐Ÿ‘‹


      Here I come with an interesting blog on ELT ( English Language Teaching ).  Here I am discussing three terms and I have found and written different words and day to day phrases in English as well as different languages. It would be a great experience to learn many other languages. How the particular word is pronounced in different languages.  I am using gif and images so it would be an interesting one.



So let's have fun together…...


        ๐Ÿ‘‰   Three terms are :


  1.  Bilingualism,

  2. Trilingualism,

  3.  Multilingualism





    So first of all I would like to discuss ' 'Bilingualism'' that means fluency in or use of two languages. Bilingualism is the ability to speak or understand two languages or the regular use of two languages. The adjective bilingual is most commonly used to describe someone who can speak or understand two languages, especially with some level of fluency.


 Trilingualism is the ability to speak three languages. Fluency in three languages.


Multilingualism is the ability of an individual speaker or a community of speakers to communicate effectively in four or more languages. Contrast with monolingualism, the ability to use only one language. A person who can speak multiple languages is known as a polyglot or a multilingual.


Let's discuss the example.


  1. Bilingualism :


Good bye (English )


Au revoir ( French )



  1. Trilingualism :


Good bye ( English)


Addio  ( Italian Language)


Sayonara  ( Japanese )


  1. Multilingualism :


Good bye (English)



๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ™‚


Au revoir ( French )



Alavida ( Nepali language )


Addio  ( Italian Language)




Sayonara  (Japanese )




Next day to day life phase is " Have a nice day or Have a good day ".......


 Let's see how is in other languages :


๐Ÿ‘‰ Have a nice day ! ( English)


๐Ÿ‘‰ Dina ranro hosa ( Nepali )

 

๐Ÿ‘‰ Apala divas changala javo ( Marathi )เค†เคชเคฒा เคฆिเคตเคธ เคšांเค—เคฒा เคœाเคตो


๐Ÿ‘‰ Bonne journรฉe ! ( Greek )




๐Ÿ‘‰ Hav en god dag ( Danish )


Next is an interesting  one

" I hate you "


๐Ÿ‘‰ I hate you ( English)




๐Ÿ‘‰ Ich hasse dich ( German)



๐Ÿ‘‰ Je te deteste ( French )



๐Ÿ‘‰ Ami apanake ghrna Kari ( Bangla)


๐Ÿ‘‰ Se miso ( Greek )



That's all form my side Bonne journรฉe ! and Addio.


Thank you ๐Ÿ˜Š







Corona epidemic And me

Hello friend !


                   Welcome to my blog. You all might have a wonderful lockdown and stay at home with your family members.  How wonderful that we know very well. Here I come with a new idea. That is about our day to day in this corona epidemic.  So today's topic is :


" Epidemic and Me "


              This task is given by Vaidehi ma'am. It is an interesting one.  Let's begin. Here I want to express my experience of how I am looking at the Corona epidemic and what is the feeling ,what difficulties I am facing throughout these days. How my mind wants to be or what I really want to be.



            We all are still in the period of Covid 19 epidemic. How long is going on that we can't say this. As each and every situation isn't the same for everyone. So the days of lockdown are quite normal. Because I  am living in a village area. And in our village we don't have any cases of Corona till this day, when I am writing about my experience. But the fear is the horrible thing. But when everything is in phase of lockdown then citizens come to villages. So I was very insecure because now the fear of Corona coming close to me.


              As a student of literature and criticism if you don't want to observe then also it comes to our eyes and ears. This interesting or you can say a disturbing thing is how other people misunderstood the  whole thing.how they reacted on various aspects. So I think two or three hours definitely to understand the concept of many government yojana and how these Corona spread and that all the things. Sometimes they tell me that don't give us too much information ..give us the point information. And sometimes they said that please you don't explain, may be my critical thinking  and my point they can't understand.


So I was rejected sometimes. ( In this epidemic  I am analysing how much the situation is and how news channels are showing 


            Like others, I do not stay at home for 24 hours because we have to do farming at a time. So I am helping my family members to work on the farm. That will give me happiness. But all the time one thing is there in mind that is how others face problems because of this epidemic. People die before they reach their home. That thing disturb me.


                 So I am thinking that how can I help other people so I have sewing art, so I am making masks for others.  That through I am helping others.



             As a girl I have pressure to learn how to cook each and every dish. My mother and grandmother had  told me that that is the best time for you to learn the best cooking ( experience makes perfect ). So that's all things going on in day to day life.


             Now I would like to talk about my educational journey.  There is lots of time for reading and learning new things .  I watched many movies and web series ( that are in my watchlist ). And also attending lots of webinars with various interesting topics. At a time the tension of examination is going on. I personally feel like I am a pawn. We can't do anything. A situation like waiting and watching just one thing we used to do is " stay home". If I am talking about the present situation then that is much better because we have started our virtual classroom.


             So in this way I used the days of the epidemic that are going on. Sometimes it's too boring, but the habit of reading makes me comfortable with things. And also I would like to say that my creativity level increased this time.




       That's all  !


If you want to share your views then write on the comment section.


     Good bye.



            




Sonnet 18 : Deconstructive writing


     Welcome readers !


             Before I begin the main phrase of my deconstructive writing of the poem sonnet 18, I want to share another blog that is also on deconstructive writing. ( Thinking activity on Derrida ) click here…..


        Here I would like to share a link that through you get an idea about this blog and also you can learn through the video and the multiple choice test and the discussion by Dr. Dilip Barad sir. That  is in Ed. Ted platform.


( Click here........



        And also it was an amazing experience to learn the platform like Ed. Ted. The features help us to make them learn more better with videos, tests and also discussion and also the task. It was a good experience.


       As we know the theory Deconstruction and Post - structuralism coined by famous philosopher Jacques Derrida.  What is the meaning of Deconstruction ? In the criticism of literature, Deconstruction is a theory and practice of reading which questions and claims to 'subvert' or ' undermine' the assumption that the system of language provides grounds that are adequate to establish the boundaries and the coherence or unity, and the determinate meaning of a literary text. Basically it is involved in structuralism but he carries this structuralist movement to its logical extreme and his reasoning is original and startling. 


          Deconstruction is an approach to understanding the relationship between text and meaning. But also he talked about free play of meaning and undecidability. There is also a concept of decentering the center. That is to say that according to Derrida there is no presence or truth apart from a language. There is no reality other than textuality. In Deconstruction we find that one of the important things is Binary opposition.


                     We know the concept of the Deconstruction but sometimes it is difficult to apply it to any literary work.  Normally that is happening in our education. So let's begin the Deconstructive writing of the poem, that is the poem by the most famous English poet and dramatist none other than The great William Shakespeare. The whole poem is given below :


Sonnet 18: Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day?


BY WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE



Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day?

Thou art more lovely and more temperate:

Rough winds do shake the darling buds of May,

And summer’s lease hath all too short a date;

Sometime too hot the eye of heaven shines,

And often is his gold complexion dimm'd;

And every fair from fair sometime declines,

By chance or nature’s changing course untrimm'd;

But thy eternal summer shall not fade,

Nor lose possession of that fair thou ow’st;

Nor shall death brag thou wander’st in his shade,

When in eternal lines to time thou grow’st:

   So long as men can breathe or eyes can see,

   So long lives this, and this gives life to thee.


             This sonnet is certainly the most famous in the sequence of Shakespeare’s sonnets; it may be the most famous lyric poem in English.


             The opening line of the sonnet is one of the most quoted Shakespearean lines. It is also one of the most eloquent statements of the power of the written word. Shakespeare preserves his friend in the lines of the poem. Here we are making textual analysis of the language. 


           This is a much debatable poem among Scholars because of many scholars who said that the series of poems is about his beloved  and others who said that the first 126 sonnets were originally addressed to a young man, who is the friend of Shakespeare. That is sparking debates about Shakespeare’s sexuality. The nature of the relationship between the two men is highly ambiguous and it is often impossible to tell if Shakespeare is describing platonic or erotic love.


       If we try to understand the poem then the first line of the poem :

 

Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day?


            In which Shakespeare talks about his beloved or his male friend  that is not clear. If we put his beloved here then this poem must have become a love poem.  The poem is  simply a statement of praise about the beauty of the beloved. And if we put as a friend then also the poem means differently. 


              And also here we can see that the opening line through it looks like a nature poem because  of the description of summer days, rough wind, buds,etc.


          If we read a whole poem and understand the deep context then the poem is not about nature or beloved that is more than that.


By chance or nature’s changing course untrimm'd;

In the opening line the poet compares his beloved with the summer's day but in the 8th and 9th lines he turns his view like nature changed with time and  if he compares his beloved with nature then there should be changes. So whether should he compare or not that is the question. Again we can see how this poem's center is decentered by its own.

     

But thy eternal summer shall not fade,


      Here we can say that eternal summer is not possible because of nature's cycle. Then the last lines of the poem  though we get an idea that here he was not praising his beloved but praising himself.  We can say that he sings a song by himself. That is self-reflexivity,  is the process by which an artist refers to his own art. 


So long lives this, and this gives life to thee.


That is exactly what Shakespeare does in the last line of this sonnet by referring to his poem as “this”. He is intensely aware of the value that his own poetry can accord to something. He knows that his poetry can, in fact, make his beloved immortal. That way we may assume that the poem is about immortal love. The poetic speaker asserts that she cannot be thus compared because she shall be eternal through the power of his poetic lines.


        Interestingly, not everyone is willing to accept the role of Sonnet 18 as the ultimate English love poem. As James Boyd-White puts it:


What kind of love does 'this' in fact give to 'thee'? We know nothing of the beloved's form or height or hair or eyes or bearing, nothing of her character or mind, nothing of her at all, really. This 'love poem' is actually written not in praise of the beloved, as it seems, but in praise of itself. Death shall not brag, says the poet; the poet shall brag. This famous sonnet is on this view one long exercise in self-glorification, not a love poem at all; surely not suitable for earnest recitation at a wedding or anniversary party, or in a Valentine. (142)


               The ending couplet finalizes the theme of eternal beauty and youth caught in the poet's immortalizing lines by saying she will live as long as "men can breathe or eyes can see."


       To conclude we can't exactly say what the poem means by. Because the center is decentered there is also a free play of meaning. So this is how the poem is . Deconstruction is  not in order to reject or discard them, but to reconstitute them in another way.





Boyd-White, James. The Desire for Meaning in Law and Literature. Current Legal Problems. Volume 53. Ed. M. Freeman. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2000.


Shakespeare, William. "Sonnet 18: Shall I Compare Thee to a Summer's..." Poetry Foundation. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 July 2020. <https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/45087/sonnet-18-shall-i-compare-thee-to-a-summers-day>.


        





The Plague - Epidemic literature

                          เคจเคฎเคธ्เคคे friends

              I hope you are staying at home  and follow the rules of lockdown, that through we are fighting against COVID-19. We know that the current situation is very questionable, suspicious for human beings. We don't know what is happening next, what is the future for us. So welcome to these disputable conditions. Our country is in a mood of fighting against Coronavirus.


                As a student of Literature and criticism, I am thinking that How this terrible situation affects literature ? How is this situation portrayed in literature? whether this type of literature is existing or not?  If yes then which kind of story is there? Situations are similar to us or not? How do people deal with this type of situation at that particular time period? 

            When we look for epidemic 
Literature then got a very important and interesting novel by Albert Camus.





He was a French philosopher, author, and journalist. He won the Nobel Prize in Literature at the age of 44 in 1957, the second-youngest recipient in history. The novel is " The Plague" published in 1947. 




            
           So here I am going to write about the novel The Plague. This novel is a very popular novel, Psychological fiction, Philosophical fiction and Absurdist fiction. Originally written in French language ( la Peste). The Plague, an allegory of the German occupation of France and an attack on dogma and cowardice, established the reputation of Albert Camus. Today, argues Tony Judt, it is more relevant than ever.

The novel is believed to be based on the cholera epidemic that killed a large proportion of Oran's population in 1849 following French colonization, but the novel is set in the 1940s. Oran and its surroundings were struck by disease several times before Camus published his novel.


"The Plague" is a famous allegorical novel by Albert Camus, who's known for his existential works.So the initial impression is that  the novel is about pestilence of plague disease. Shakespeare also used a word pestilence : " I'll Pour this pestilence into his ear "
Albert Camus believed that human suffering is meaningless in itself but an individual can make his or her life meaningful by rebelling against suffering. Being an atheist he did not believe that God had assigned any meaning to suffering, that is, suffering cannot be said to be just punishment for human sins. Camus brings out this idea through Dr. Rieux’s attitude towards Father Paneloux, the Jesuit priest who preaches that God has sent the plague to Oran in order to teach the people a lesson.

So here I am writing about my initial impression of reading the novel "The Plague". So the COVID-19 epidemic is going on and this time the reading of the book is a very interesting one. Because the viral situation is also similar to the novel's calamities. Because of this pestilence, it is easy to understand the psychological and philosophical conditions. Let's discuss through the points : 


Humanity : Human self centeredness v/s  human sacrifice


           In the  novel we have many situations that symbolize both self-centeredness and human sacrifice. Dr. Rieux was the most relevant example of self sacrifice. Because his wife was admitted in the hospital and he was busy in his work  for the sake of plague patients he was sacrificing everything. He does not think about health but he more thinks about diseased people. He sacrificed his love towards his wife and his family.


Somehow the character of cottard who is similar, for that police has been arresting him. But because of the plague pestilence he was not arrested by police. That's why he was happy and he wanted that this epidemic never end that showed his self centeredness. Because if the situation changed then he must be arrested by police. Rambert also self centered early in the novel. But he was changed at the end.


          We may assume that humanity's concept changed person to person.  Every situation affects the human mind in a different manner. So humanity changed with each person. That's why the question raised is :  what is humanity ?


"You can't understand. You're using the language of reason, not of the heart; you live in a world of abstractions."

There is a contrast between reason and emotions.

Lack of women character :


       If we closely observe the novel then and then we find that in the novel we do not find any strong women character. Two characters are there like,


Mme. Rieux - mother of Dr. Rieux


Old Spanish  women : the conversation  between Raymond Rambert is an important one.  In a way Camus doesn't give attention to women's character. 


The old Spanish women went to Mass every morning. "Don't you believe in God"  she asked Rambert.


' But the old Spanish women lost nothing of her serenity '


            These sentences show that Camus showed women character as religious. Maybe it is true also. 

Science v/s Religion : 

        Each and every calamity we find is the conflict between Science v/s religion.  Here in the novel we find that the concept of science v/s religion. Paneloux was the priest in church. In his holy speech he said that the disease of plague is the punishment of God. Because the people of Oran had committed innumerable crimes so  that's why God became angry on them. This type of foolish advice given by him.
           
         But in the other side Dr. Castel and Dr. Rieux is  doing their job. They don't stay with hope in god but they believe in work, in the sense of science to find medicine for patients. So here is like to mentioned Dr.Rieux words for Paneloux :

"Paneloux is a man of learning, a scholar. He hasn't come in contact with death; that's why he can speak with such assurance of the truth — with a capital T. But every country priest who visits his parishioners and has heard a man gasping for breath on his deathbed thinks as I do. He'd try to relieve human suffering before trying to point out its goodness." ( Part-2)

   In a way Dr. Rieux believed in the philosophy of karma.

  • References :

  •  Camus, Albert (1970). Philip Thody (ed.). Albert Camus: Lyrical and Critical Essays. Ellen Conroy Kennedy, translator. Vintage Books. ISBN 978-0-394-70852-2.